To be or not to be(Hindu)?

On Aamir Khan's latest movie PK being apparently offensive to Hindus, various lesser Hindu outfits have claimed that their outrage is not regarding the fact that Bollywood keeps ripping off posters from obscure Portuguese singers, but because Mr. Khan is a Muslim and he made fun of cows.

But by Shri Shri Hanumanji and Maa Kali, that is a contradiction by Lord Rama's line of reasoning. Hence, apasanskritik(or whatever).

1. Mr. Khan is a Muslim.
2. Mr. Khan's film is offensive because he's Muslim(I.e. Not Hindu).
Taking the contrapositive of 2., we get-
2'. Mr. Khan's film would not be offensive were he not Muslim.

A. Mr. Khan is an Indian. (For Ganesha's sake! He teaches you about being a good Indian on a frickin' Star Plus show)
B. All Indians are Hindus.
A. and B. imply
C. Mr. Khan is Hindu.

Now C. taken with 2' give us a contradiction.
So either PK is just offensive, irrespective of the religious identity of its lead actor OR Muslims are not Indians.

Also, a happy and sanskari New Year to you all!
Remember, no partying or sex outside marriage, or Lord Indra will strike you down with fire and brimstone.